Animals Were Harmed Hollywoods Nightmare of Death, Injury, and Secrecy Exposed. The result of the flaws in the AHAs process from its selection of monitors to the restrictions on their work and the organizations resistance to aggressively investigate alleged animal mistreatment calls into question the film ratings published on the organizations website, which assess the quality and scope of animal welfare on productions, and the No Animals Were Harmed credit itself. Given the end credits blunt declarative statement, there would not appear to be much wiggle room. But interviews with AHA sources, along with internal documents, suggest that the AHA repeatedly has presented a more positive picture of what transpired on productions than its own monitors internal logs would justify. Sources say that the end credit disclaimers are adjudicated, and film rating reviews composed, without the input of the monitors who were actually on set during production, and sometimes without even reviewing their reports. Watch What Do You Say To A Naked Lady? Online Full Movie. The AHA denies this. Indeed, they say there is no set formula governing such findings, which in the end have in certain cases been determined by executives who are overly concerned with how such decisions may affect the organizations industry relationships. The AHA does not explain why the films get the ratings they do to hide the fact that they do not give them accurately across the board and that special relationships may be taken into account, says one staffer. Chicago-Fire-episode-pic-chicago-fire-2012-tv-series-30829167-1000-669.jpg' alt='Watch Fire From Below Online Hollywoodreporter' title='Watch Fire From Below Online Hollywoodreporter' />Well I seem to have a big influx of new readers Cant think why. Please feel free to say hello in here, and please check out the archives and have a. Management pressures postproduction its department responsible for the assessments to give good reviews. Even relationships that arent special yet might be in the future, and they dont want to rock the boat. For example, Disneys Eight Below was awarded the end credit despite a March 2. The hero dog seriously got into a fight with two other dogs. Kris Jenner and Leah Remini Have More in Common Than You Think. The trainer beat the dog harshly, which included five punches to its diaphragm. Our rep spoke to him about this, and he expressed that he had no choice. The office instructed the rep to pull the dog. In its statement to THR, the AHA says, The trainer had to use force to break up the fight. As a result, the dogs were not injured. The AHA rep also asked for more trainers to be on set. On another Disney project, 2. The Chronicles of Narnia Prince Caspian, horses repeatedly were pulled from production for lameness and injuries AHA internal database notes from June 2. Yet the production still received the No Animals Were Harmed disclaimer. According to AHAs statement to THR, the end credit was justified because none of the injuries were serious and none were due to intentional harm. In another incident, 2. Son of the Mask, from New Line, received the end credit, though a Feb. Rep said they died when the prop department totally changed the water in the tank and replaced it with town tap water. Again, the AHA says in its statement, the credit was bestowed because we believed this was not an intentional act of cruelty, though it also added that the organization today would not evaluate it in the same way. In an interview with THR, Candy Spelling, a national AHA board member, defends the organizations intent behind the No Animals Were Harmed end credit. I think what people think it means is that when a horse dies in the movies, it didnt really die, she says. Watch Fire From Below Online Hollywoodreporter' title='Watch Fire From Below Online Hollywoodreporter' />I think that people think the AHAs monitoring is just when the cameras are rolling. As for her interpretation of the end credit, she says, I assume that no animals were harmed during the shooting.